Disinformation as a form of aggression: Ukraine and its partners amidst the Russian fake news (early 2021)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4959700

Keywords:

disinformation, Russia, news, fake

Abstract

The various disinformation-related issues are now of the greatest relevance, as evidenced not only by the emergence (especially over the past few years) of a number of basic scientific studies on the analysis of the phenomenon, but also the development by both Western countries and Ukraine (in the conditions of daily struggle against hybrid Russian aggression) of the strategies that provide not only resistance (detection and refutation) of Russian disinformation, but also an adequate response – punishing Russia for the damage done to democracy by relentless “dispersal” of the fake news, in particular – in early 2021.

Taking into account the differences in the interpretation of the concept of “disinformation” and using the guidelines of the European Commission on its content, we conducted the analysis of data, concentrated in the “Disinfo Database” (created by East StratCom Task Force within the project “EUvsDiSiNFO”), according to the following algorithm:

- the languages were established, in which Russia disseminated disinformation about Ukraine and its support by European states, the United States, etc.;

- calculations were made of both the number of Russian fake news created and disseminated in the world information space (in the period from 01.01.2021 to 30.04.2021) regarding Ukraine and the states that provide it support (to a greater or lesser extent) in the fight against the aggressor, and the number of information resources used in disseminating disinformation;

- there were identified and analyzed the dominant issues of Russian disinformation, the peculiarities of the construction of fake news by the aggressor state (in particular, by returning to imperial and Soviet propaganda narratives, distortion or fabrication of facts, insinuations, etc.) and it was proved that Russia carefully carried out “disinformation support” of the states and their leaders, actions of international organizations aimed at supporting Ukraine; in addition, it disinformed the international community about Ukraine’s domestic policy.

The opinion was justified that the development and dissemination of disinformation is one of Russia’s course of action on the international arena, a form of its aggression (in the context of hybrid wars) against Ukraine and Western democracies and their leaders, as well as international democratic organizations, a means of discrediting and defamation of opponents and adversaries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ivan Ablazov , Military-Diplomatic Academy named after Yevgeny Bereznyak

Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor, Chief of the Department

Mariia Karmazina , Military-Diplomatic Academy named after Yevgeny Bereznyak

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Head of Department of Social and Political History

References

Ackeret, M. (2021). Das Stigma des «unfreundlichen Landes» – Russland erprobt eine neue diplomatische Waffe. Available from: https://www.nzz.ch/international/russland-liste-unfreundlicher-staaten-belastet-beziehungen-ld.1625581?reduced=true

Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 31 (Number 2. Spring). 211–236. Available from: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

BBC News. What is 2017’s word of the year? (2017). Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41838386

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, Y. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation and Radicalization in American Politics. New York, US Oxford University Press.

Democracy in the Disinformation Age: Influence and Activism in American Politics. (2021). Luttrell, R., Xiao, L., Glass, J., (Eds.). London, Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News in Social Media. Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities (2020). Shu, K., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H. (Eds.). Springer.

EUvsDiSiNFO. (2021). Available from: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?disinfo_keywords%5B%5D=77547&disinfo_keywords%5B%5D=77311&disinfo_keywords%5B%5D=77158&date=01.01.2021%20-%2030.04.2021&disinfo_language%5B%5D=Russian&disinfo_countries%5B%5D=77547&per_page

EUvsDiSiNFO. About. (2015). Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-disinformation

Fact sheet: Imposing Costs for Harmful Foreign Activities by the Russian Government» (2021). Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/15/fact-sheet-imposing-costs-for-harmful-foreign-activities-by-the-russian-government/

Interim National Security Strategic Guidance (2021). Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf

Merriam-Webster dictionaries. Definition of disinformation in English (2021). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disinformation

Nelson, J., Taneja, H. (2018). The Small, Disloyal Fake News Audience: The Role of Audience Availability in Fake News Consumption. New Media & Society. 20 (7). 1–18. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322820042_The_Small_Disloyal_Fake_News_Audience_The_Role_of_Audience_Availability_in_Fake_News_Consumption

Oxford living dictionaries. Definition of disinformation in English (2021). Available from: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/disinformation

Singer, PW, Emerson, T. Brooking. (2019). LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Stengel, R. (2020). Information Wars. How We Lost the Global Battle Against Disinformation and What We Can Do About It. Grove Press.

Tackling online disinformation (2021). Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-disinformation

Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder. Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-version-august-2018/16808c9c77

Wardle, C., Derekshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making, Council of Europe report, DGI (2017)09. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c

Wolley, S. (2020). The Reality Game: How the Next Wave of Technology Will Break the Truth. Public Affairs.

Xiaofan, L., Whinston, A. B. (2020). A model of fake data in data-driven analysis. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 21. 1–26 Available from: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume21/17-360/17-360.pdf

Dorosh, S. (2021). RNBO, Danilov i Donbas. Chy spravdi hovoryty «narod Donbasu» nebezpechno. [National Security and Defense Council, Danilov and Donbass. Is it really dangerous to say “the people of Donbass”]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-56606837

The President approved the Regulations on the Center for Countering Disinformation (2021). [The President approved the Regulations on the Center for Countering Disinformation]. Available from: https://www.president.gov.ua/news/prezident-zatverdiv-polozhennya-pro-centr-protidiyi-dezinfor-68317

Ratsybarska, Yu. (2021). V okupovanykh Donbasi ta Krymu pryshchepliuietsia «sovietsko-rosiiska identychnist» – doslidnyk henotsydu v Ukraini. [In the occupied Donbass and Crimea, a “Soviet-Russian identity” is being instilled, a researcher of genocide in Ukraine]. Available from: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/30705097.html

Presidential Decree №187/2021. Questions of the Center for Counteracting Disinformation. (2021a). [Questions of the Center for Counteracting Disinformation]. Available from: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/1872021-38841

Presidential Decree №43/2021. Pro rishennia Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy vid 2 liutoho 2021 roku “Pro zastosuvannia personalnykh spetsialnykh ekonomichnykh ta inshykh obmezhuvalnykh zakhodiv (sanktsii)”. [On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of February 2, 2021 “On the application of personal special economic and other restrictive measures (sanctions)”]. (2021b). Available from: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/432021-36441.

Downloads


Abstract views: 721
Downloads: 327

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Ablazov , I. ., & Karmazina , M. . (2021). Disinformation as a form of aggression: Ukraine and its partners amidst the Russian fake news (early 2021). Political Science and Security Studies Journal, 2(2), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4959700

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

The authors agree with the following conditions:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.

3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).