Theory-practice problems of public national security policy related to the concept of “complexity” (methodological aspect)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5809495Keywords:
the complexity of national security, interdisciplinary methodology, post-non-classical science, public policyAbstract
The article analyzes the theoretical and methodological approaches to substantiate the complexity of the phenomenon of “national security”. It concerns the prospects for the application of principles and methods of post-non-classical science in the study of this phenomenon, which are productive in relation to complex, nonlinear, open systems that are self-developing. The factors that determine the differences between classical and non-classical science in terms of revealing the essence of the phenomenon of complexity of national security are identified and characterized. The necessity is substantiated for supplementing the classical theory of national security with post-non-classical scientific exploration as the complexity of the security environment with a number of concepts: “organizational complexity”, “complexity as an uncertainty”, “complexity as a risk”, “information complexity”, etc. Post-non-classical ideas of the phenomenon of complexity of national security as a category of political science are developed and a possible typology of diversity of concepts of its complexity is offered. It is determined that the development of the complexity of national security becomes ambiguous and allows many options. On this basis, the fundamental differences between post-non-classical rationality and classical rationality in the study, development and implementation of public national security policy are formulated and substantiated. The preconditions for the implementation of new post-non-classical political practices of national security have been identified and substantiated.
Downloads
References
Deleuze G., Guattari F. Shcho take filosofiia? [What Is Philosophy?]. Lviv, Astroliabiia. 2015. 272 p.
Zolo D. Demokratyia i slozhnost. Realystycheskyi podkhod [Democracy and Complexity. A Realist Approach]. Moscow: Yzd-vo HU VShE, 2010. 320 p. Retrieved from: https://id.hse.ru/data/2010/11/24/1209958604/1.pdf.
Luhmann N. Vvedenye v systemnuiu teoryiu [Introduction to systems theory]. Moscow. Lohos, 2007. 360 p. Retrieved from: https://knima.ru/pages/biblio_book/214775
Morin E. Metod. Pryroda pryrody [Method. The nature of nature]. Moscow: KANON+, 2013. 373 p.
Morin E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, № 15(4) P. 371.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).