An Investigative History of Russian Speech Manipulation Strategies in Republican Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33445/psssj.2025.6.4.2Keywords:
manipulative effect, speech manipulation, political discourse, Russia, Ukraine, history, RepublicanAbstract
Donald Trump’s sophisticated use of speech manipulation strategies has inspired numerous research studies. O.I. Nazarenko and O.Ye. Nesterenko (2023) looked beyond Donald Trump at the Republican Party at large and found a pattern of manipulative effect in Republican discourse supporting Russia in the Russian-Ukrainian war. This raises many important questions for researchers. What is the political motivation for Republicans to side with Russia against Ukraine? How did this come to be? To answer these questions, this article presents the first history of Russian speech manipulation strategies in Republican discourse. The investigation traced the origin to conservative principles introduced by William F. Buckley Jr. and Barry Goldwater. Pragmatic analysis and critical discourse analysis of Republican discourse identified manipulative strategies and techniques aligning with Russian thinking of reflexive control connected across speakers and generations. This exploratory study supports the need for further speech manipulation research of Republican discourse from a historical perspective.
Downloads
References
Abuelwafa, M.A. (2021). Legitimation and Manipulation in Political Speeches: A Corpus-based Study. Procedia Computer Science, 189, pp. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.05.066.
Ajir, M., & Vailliant, B. (2020). The case for the sixth domain of war: psychological warfare in the age of advanced technology. Global Security and Intelligence Studies Journal, 5(1) 1-17. https://doi.org/10.18278/gsis.5.1.2
Akopova, A. (2013, December 20). International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE). https://ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/article/view/13
Alesina, A., Miano, A. and Stantcheva, S. (2020). The Polarization of Reality. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, pp. 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201072.
Alexander, M.G., Levin, S. and Henry, P.J. (2005). Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology, 26: 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x
Bird, K. I., Nichols, V. A., Garay, E. S., Nowatzke, M., Essary, C., Post, K. K., ...Cortus, E. L. (2022). Means, motive, and opportunity: A method for understanding stakeholder agency within food–energy–water systems. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, 10(1), 00066. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00066
Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K., White, C.H. and Ebesu, A.S. (1994). Interpersonal Deception VII. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(4), pp. 366–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x94134002.
Chernikova, V.E., Parsieva, L.K., Taisaeva, B.M., Ramazanova, S.R. and Moskalenko, D.N. (2021). Manipulation Of Mass Consciousness as a Phenomenon of the Information Society. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.11.55.
Congress.gov (2025). Presidential 2025 Tariff Actions: Timeline and Status. [online] Available at: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48549. (Accessed: Nov. 4, 2025).
Craik, P. B. (2019). The Weaponization of Postmodernism: Russia's New War with Europe (No. 146). LEQS Paper. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/303429
Critchlow, D.T. and Maclean, N. (2009). Debating the American conservative movement: 1945 to the present. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Duffy, G. (2008). Pragmatic Analysis. In: Klotz, A., Prakash, D. (eds) Qualitative Methods in International Relations. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129_11
Evans, J. (2022). Putin's information war against the United States. Russian Analytical Digest, 282, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000541999
Filimon, L. M. (2016). From the dog whistle to the dog scream: The Republican party’s (ab) use of discriminatory speech in electoral campaigns and party politics. Romanian Journal of Society and Politics, 11(2), 25-48. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=512758
Garrett, R.K. and Bond, R.M. (2021). Conservatives’ susceptibility to political misperceptions. Science Advances, 7(23). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1234.
Glüer, K. and Wikforss, A. (2022). What is knowledge resistance? In Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (pp. 29-48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111474-2
Helmbrecht, A. (2025). The freedom grift hypothesis: A qualitative analysis of the theoretical conquest of the United States using information manipulation theory. International Journal of Political Science and Governance, 7(10), pp. 399–408. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2025.v7.i10a.708.
Jones, S. G. (2025). Russia's shadow war against the West. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
Kadim, E.N. (2022). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s Election Campaign Speeches. Heliyon, 8(4), p.e09256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256.
Kenzhekanova, K., Zhanabekova, M. and Konyrbekova, T. (2015). Manipulation in Political Discourse of Mass Media. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p325.
Lee, N., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J. and Flynn, D.J. (2020). More Accurate, But No Less Polarized: Comparing the Factual Beliefs of Government Officials and the Public. British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000712342000037x.
Maillat, D. (2013). Constraining context selection: On the pragmatic inevitability of manipulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.009
Meisuri, M. and Al-Haddad, H. (2025). Semantic Shifts in Political Discourse: A Study of Language Manipulation. Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.70177/jhrs.v2i1.1924
Moghadam, M. and Jafarpour, N. (2022). “Pragmatic Annotation of Manipulation in Political Discourse: The Case of Trump-Clinton Presidential Debate”, Linguistic Forum-A Journal of Linguistics 4(4), pp. 32-39. https://linguisticforum.com/index.php/ling/article/view/134/89 (Accessed: November 4, 2025).
Nazarenko, O. I. and Nesterenko, O. Y. (2023). Verbal ways and means of manipulative effect in the discourse of the Republicans about the Russian-Ukrainian war. Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка. Філологічні науки, 1(99), pp. 105-113. https://doi.org/10.35433/philology.1(99).2023.105-113
Nimrod Kamer. (2024, September 9). Tim Pool delivers pro Putin talking points on air [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDc4dadmjNs
Oxford Languages Dictionary (2025).
Pagen, J. (2020). A new Russian realpolitik: Putin’s operationalization of psychology and propaganda. Global Security and Intelligence Studies Journal, 5(1) 55-79. https://doi.org/10.18278/gsis.5.1.5
Reinhart, R. (2018). Republicans More Positive on U.S. Relations With Russia. [online] Gallup.com. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/237137/republicans-positive-relations-russia.aspx (Accessed: Nov. 4, 2025).
Schmunk, R. (2024, September 5). U.S. accuses Russia of using unwitting influencers, fake news sites to sway presidential election. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-us-election-interference-websites-influencers-1.7313197
Shigapova, F.F., Titova, E.A., Morozova, T.V. and Sabirova, A.N. (2021). Manipulative Speech Techniques in Political Discourse. Propósitos y Representaciones, [online] 9(SPE2), pp. 1020. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE2.1020.
Styrnik, N. (2025). Linguistic Manipulations in Politics: The US Presidential Campaign 2024. Journal “Ukrainian sense”, 2(2), pp. 102-113. https://doi.org/10.15421/462428
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), pp. 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aaron Helmbrecht
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
