Between Promise and Peril: Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Indonesia’s Counter-Violent Extremism Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33445/psssj.2026.7.2.2Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Countering Violent Extremism, Indonesia, Technology Governance, Global SouthAbstract
This qualitative research examines the ways in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being utilised to prevent and counter violent extremism (P/CVE) in Indonesia, as well as the obstacles that hinder its broader implementation. The study aims to answer two key questions: (1) How can AI concretely enhance Indonesia's P/CVE efforts? (2) What limitations and challenges emerge when incorporating AI into these efforts? For the study, a purposive sample of fifteen AI experts was recruited from the National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT), the Counterterrorism Special Detachment 88 (Densus 88), academics, AI startups, civil society organisations (CSOs) focused on digital rights, and former terrorist offenders. Semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed through thematic coding in Atlas.ti. The findings indicate that AI currently aids Indonesian P/CVE operations in three main ways: monitoring social media activities, complementing conventional P/CVE efforts, and detecting online extremism efficiently. The challenges include algorithmic biases, a lack of public trust towards the government’s use of AI, and legal barriers to integrating AI into P/CVE efforts. The study also underscores useful recommendations, including collaboration among relevant stakeholders, adherence to ethical principles, and investment in public training on AI use. This research presents timely insights for policymakers, technology developers, and civil society by exploring how AI can be ethically and effectively incorporated into P/CVE strategies in Indonesia. The findings aim to inform the development of more inclusive, rights-respecting AI frameworks that balance national security needs with public trust. Beyond local relevance, the study contributes to global debates by offering a bottom-up perspective from the Global South that challenges Western-centric models of technology governance. It demonstrates how Indonesia’s experience provides a transferable framework for other nations navigating the dual promise and peril of AI in securitisation, while also interrogating the competing logics of security and human rights within multi-stakeholder governance models for emerging technologies.
Downloads
References
Ahlin, E. M. (2019). Semi-Structured Interviews With Expert Practitioners: Their Validity and Significant Contribution to Translational Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Akilli, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Counterterrorism: Navigating the Intersection of Security, Ethics, and Privacy. Perspektive, 73, 1–5.
Akinnagbe, O. B. (2024). Human-AI Collaboration: Enhancing Productivity and Decision-Making. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 2(2), 387–417.
Aminah, S., Kartika, R. S., Susilo, S. R. T., Sipahutar, H., Asrori, Wibowo, C., Sabtohadi, J., U.R., F., Supratikta, H., Maemunah, S., & Rahayiningsih, Y. (2023). Combating Terrorism in Indonesia through Collaborative Strategy. Migration Letters, 21(1), 561–571.
Arora, M. K., Lal, S., Singh, B., & Raghav, A. (2025). Balancing Security With Civil Liberties and Risks in AI-Driven Surveillance. In P. K. Dutta, B. Singh, C. Kaunert, & A. L. Sciacovelli (Eds.), Security Intelligence in the Age of AI. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Barton, G. (2024). Southeast Asia’s Threat Environment in 2024. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 16(4), 1–9.
Bernard, H. R. (2018). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bloch-Wehba, H. (2021). Content Moderation as Surveillance. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 36(3), 1297–1340.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Allyn and Bacon.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.
Carter-Visscher, R., Bell, K. M., & Blankenship, A. S. (2011). Ethical Issues in Research on Sensitive Topics: Participants’ Experiences of Distress and Benefit. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 55–64.
Casula, M., Rangarajan, N., & Shields, P. (2021). The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research. Quality & Quantity, 55, 1703–1725.
Craanen, A., Allen, E., & Atamuradova, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence for Counter Extremism: Exploring Threats, Challenges, Opportunities and Needs for Leveraging Generative AI in Countering Extremism. Hedayah.
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public administration: Understanding actors, governance, and policy from micro, meso, and macro perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2).
Gordon, B. G. (2020). Vulnerability in Research: Basic Ethical Concepts and General Approach to Review. Ochsner Journal, 20, 34–38.
Goyal, P. (2022). The Importance of Data Encryption in Data Security. Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization, 13(1), 1–11.
Grealy, K. (2018). Indonesia: Countering A Message of Hate. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/indonesia-countering-message-hate
Harkness, J., Lederer, S. E., & Wikler, D. (2001). Laying ethical foundations for clinical research. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 365–372.
Hasibuan, H., & Tijow, L. M. (2024). The Government’s Role in Enforcing the Law Against Perpetrators of Terrorism. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1–16.
Hobart, L. N. (2025). AI, Bias, and National Security Profiling. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 40(1), 1–165.
ICT Watch. (2024). 9 Rekomendasi ICT Watch untuk Masa Depan AI yang Inklusif dan Bertanggung Jawab [9 ICT Watch Recommendations for an Inclusive and Responsible AI Future]. https://internetsehat.id/2024/03/31/9-rekomendasi-ict-watch-untuk-masa-depan-ai-yang-inklusif-dan-bertanggung-jawab/
Ilyas, M., & Athwal, R. (2021). De-Radicalisation and Humanitarianism in Indonesia. Social Sciences, 10(87), 1–17.
Irfan, M., Almeshal, Z. A., & Anwar, M. (2023). Unleashing Transformative Potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Countering Terrorism, Online Radicalisation, Extremism, and Possible Recruitment. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, 8(4), 1–15.
Ismail, N. H. (2024). Countering Online Radicalisation in Southeast Asia Through the 5M Framework. RSIS Commentary, 138.
Ismail, N. H. (2024). Social Media’s Dark Side in Online Radicalisation. RSIS Commentary, 167.
Jones, K. (2023). AI governance and human rights: Resetting the relationship. Chatham House.
Kang, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2023). The Importance of Anonymity and Confidentiality for Conducting Survey Research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1–7.
Karatsareas, P. (2022). Semi-Structured Interviews. In Research Methods in Language Attitudes. Cambridge University Press.
Kaskina, R., & Cvetkovska, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) and human rights: Using AI as a weapon of repression and its impact on human rights. European Union.
Klar, S., & Leeper, T. J. (2019). Identities and Intersectionality: A Case for Purposive Sampling in Survey-Experimental Research. In P. J. Lavrakas, M. W. Traugott, C. Kennedy, A. L. Holbrook, E. D. de Leeuw, & B. T. West (Eds.), Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Klykken, F. H. (2021). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795–810.
Land, M. K., & Aronson, J. D. (2020). Human Rights and Technology: New Challenges for Justice and Accountability. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 223–240.
Lehnert, K., Craft, J., Singh, N., & Park, Y.-H. (2016). The human experience of ethics: A review of a decade of qualitative ethical decision- making research. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(4), 498–537.
Mastrobattista, L., Muñoz-Rico, M., & Cordón-García, J. A. (2024). Optimizing Textual Analysis in Higher Education Studies Through Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS) with Atlas.ti. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 622–632.
Min, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Bias: Challenges, Implications, and Remedies. Journal of Social Research, 2(11), 3808–3817.
Morell, S. (2023). Balancing Standardization and Flexibility: How to Get the Most Out of Your Interviews. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 21(2), 39–41.
Mosa, M. J., Barhoom, A. M., Alhabbash, M. I., Harara, F. E., Abu-Nasser, B. S., & Abu-Nasser, S. S. (2024). AI and Ethics in Surveillance: Balancing Security and Privacy in a Digital World. International Journal of Academic Engineering Research, 8(10), 8–15.
Mutiara, R. (2025). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Countering Online Radicalisation in Indonesia. RSIS Commentary, 157.
Ñañez-Silva, M. V., Quispe-Calderón, J., Huallpa-Quispe, P. M., & Larico-Quispe, B. N. (2024). Analysis of academic research data with the use of ATLAS.ti. Experiences of use in the area of Tourism and Hospitality Administration. Data and Metadata, 3(306), 1–13.
Nelu, C. (2024). Exploitation of Generative AI by Terrorist Groups. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. https://icct.nl/publication/exploitation-generative-ai-terrorist-groups#:~:text=Regarding%20counter%2Dpropaganda%20and%20de,and%20analysing%20their%20online%20behaviour.
Nuraniyah, N. (2019). The Evolution of Online Violent Extremism in Indonesia and the Philippines. Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies.
Raji, I., & Sholademi, D. B. (2024). Predictive Policing: The Role of AI in Crime Prevention. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 13(10), 66–78.
Reddy, L. S., & Ramasamy, K. (2016). Justifying The Judgmental Sampling Matrix Organization in Outsourcing Industry. Vidushi, July-December, 17–25.
Riyanta, S. (2022). Shortcut to Terrorism: Self-Radicalization and Lone-Wolf Terror Acts: A Case Study of Indonesia. Journal of Terrorism Study, 4(1), 1–20.
Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied Qualitative Research Design: A Total Quality Framework Approach. The Guilford Press.
Rulinawaty, R., Samboteng, L., Aripin, S., Basit, M., & Kasmad, M. R. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence capability and public trust on service performance in Indonesia. Premiere International Seminar on Engineering, Chemical and Biological. AIP Conference Proceeding.
Sapkota, M. (2024). Implications and Critiques of Quantitative Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 5(3), 153–159.
Satria, A. (2022). Two Decades of Counterterrorism in Indonesia. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 14(5), 7–16.
Scheuble, S., & Oezmen. (2022). Extremists’ Targeting of Young Women on Social Media and Lessons for P/CVE. Office of the European Union.
Sumarno, & Affianty, D. (2024). The Relationship between Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Building Harmony in Diversity. International Journal of Political Sciences, 10(1), 21–28.
Sumpter, C. (2024). Decentralising and Coordinating P/CVE through the Indonesia Knowledge Hub (I- KHub). Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 16(4), 10–16.
Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2024). Qualitative Study. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Tongco, Ma. D. C. (2007). Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5, 147–158.
Tremblay, M.-A. (1957). The Key Informant Technique: A Nonethnographic Application. American Anthropologist, 59(4), 688–701.
UNCRI, & UNCCT. (2021). Countering Terrorism Online with Artificial Intelligence: An Overview for Law Enforcement and Counter-Terrorism Agencies in South Asia and South-East Asia. UNICRI and UNCCT.
Ünver, H. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) and human rights: Using AI as a weapon of repression and its impact on human rights. European Union.
Walford, G. (2005). Research ethical guidelines and anonymity. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28(1), 83–93.
Widya, B. (2020). Deradicalization in Indonesia: Implementation and Challenge. Journal of Terrorism Studies, 2(1), 32–50.
Zeiger, S., & Gyte, J. (2021). Prevention of Radicalization on Social Media and the Internet. In A. P. Schmid (Ed.), Handbook of Terrorism Prevention and Preparedness. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raneeta Mutiara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
