Integration of Intelligence Processes into NATO’s Strategic and Operational Planning System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33445/psssj.2026.7.3.2Keywords:
Intelligence Integration, Strategic Planning, Operational Planning, Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, Multi-Domain Operations, Intelligence Governance, Decision SupportAbstract
The evolving security environment, characterized by hybrid threats, multidomain operations, rapid technological change, and growing volumes of information, requires closer integration of intelligence into NATO’s strategic and operational planning. Existing Alliance concepts, including Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (JISR), Multi-Domain Operations (MDO), the NATO Operational Planning Process (OPP), and the Comprehensive Approach, provide complementary foundations but do not independently provide an end-to-end intelligence governance architecture. The aim of this study is to examine the evolution, organizational architecture, and functional integration of NATO intelligence within strategic and operational planning and to develop a conceptual model for intelligence-driven planning. Using qualitative conceptual, comparative, structural-functional, and process analyses of NATO doctrinal and policy documents and relevant academic literature, the study identifies functional relationships among intelligence requirements, collection, processing, analysis, decision support, operational execution, assessment, feedback, and organizational learning. The proposed model treats intelligence as a continuous governance function linking strategic objectives to operational decisions and assessed effects. It complements JISR, MDO, OPP, and the Comprehensive Approach while incorporating artificial intelligence, decision-support systems, geographic information systems, big data analytics, and C4ISR/C5ISR as enabling capabilities that support human-centered decision-making. The conceptual contribution is an integrated framework for continuous intelligence-to-decision traceability and adaptive feedback across the planning lifecycle. Its practical value lies in supporting interoperability, planning refinement, multinational exercises, capability development, and subsequent empirical validation of intelligence integration mechanisms.
Downloads
References
Andrushko, M., Arkushenko, P., Kuznetsov, V., & Andrushko, A. (2023). Substantiation of a generalized model of the functioning of a promising information and measuring system for collecting and processing information. Collection of Scientific Works of the State Research Institute for Testing and Certification of Armaments and Military Equipment, 3(17), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.37701/dndivsovt.17.2023.01
Babayev, S., Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. (2026). Conceptual-theoretical foundations and the transformative role of artificial intelligence in multidomain operations. Grail of Science, 64, 606–615. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.20.03.2026.069
Batalov, M., Korostelov, V., Yarysh, I., & Zozulya, L. (2025). Perspectives on the process of defining goals during the planning and execution of joint fire support in a combined arms brigade according to NATO standards. Testing and Certification, 3(9), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.37701/ts.09.2025.06
Buluc, R., Arcos, R., & Ivan, C. (2025). When spies go public! Lessons learnt from the instrumentalization of intelligence for strategic communication in the run-up to the Russian-Ukrainian war. Intelligence and National Security, 40(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2024.2405255
Díaz Matey, G. (2026). New horizons in intelligence cooperation: Spain and the evolution of EU and NATO intelligence. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 39(2), 554–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2024.2426723
Fijałka, M. (2025). NATO Artificial Intelligence Centre of Excellence. Internal Security, 17(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.4516
Frame, M. E., Kaiser, J., Kegley, J., Armstrong, J., & Schlessman, B. (2024). Impacts of decision support systems on cognition and performance for intelligence-gathering path planning. Military Psychology, 36(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2023.2178210
Gilli, A., Gilli, M., & Grgić, G. (2025). NATO, multi-domain operations and the future of the Atlantic Alliance. Comparative Strategy, 44(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2024.2445491
Hanna, M., Granzow, D., Bolte, B., & Alvarado, A. (2017). NATO intelligence and information sharing: Improving NATO strategy for stabilization and reconstruction operations. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 16(4), 5–33.
Hallams, E. (2011). North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). In G. Martel (Ed.), The encyclopedia of war. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444338232.wbeow454
Johnson, J. (2023). Automating the OODA loop in the age of intelligent machines: Reaffirming the role of humans in command-and-control decision-making in the digital age. Defence Studies, 23(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2102486
Jones, J. (2022). Integrating and shaping military cyber defence in operational and intelligence planning. International Conference on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime, 9, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.19107/CYBERCON.2022.07
Kacmarik, O., & Vasicek, R. (2024). The multi-domain approach to military operations and its challenges to intelligence and intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance. In Proceedings of the Challenges to National Defence in Contemporary Geopolitical Situation, Brno, Czech Republic, 11–13 September 2024. https://doi.org/10.3849/cndcgs.2024.357
Kobzan, S., Pomortseva, O., Pankiv, V., Kharchenko, O., & Panteleieva, N. (2025). Military geoinformation systems: Application paths and development prospects. Testing and Certification, 1(7), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.37701/ts.07.2025.08
Kulyk, T. (2023). Joint intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance as a priority area of NATO transformation. Bulletin of the Mariupol State University. Series: History. Political Science, 35–36, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-2830-2023-13-35-36-100-110
Kutej, L., & Horak, L. (2025). Emerging intelligence paradigms in the Russia-Ukraine war: CROWDINT, CITINT, and the digital battlespace. Obrana a Strategie, 25(1), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.25.2025.01.193-211
Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Li, H., et al. (2024). An adaptive operation planning and EBO-BPNN optimization method for decision support systems. Scientific Reports, 14, 21838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72808-y
Minniti, F., & Pili, G. (2025). NATO’s evolving landscape in open source intelligence. The RUSI Journal, 170(6–7), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2025.2589828
Munir, M., Mantoro, T., & Ayu, M. A. (2024). Enhancing military C4I-SR through integrating AI for optimized combat effectiveness. In 10th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED64257.2024.10983638
Muller, W., Reinert, F., Pfirrmann, U., Muhlenberg, D., & Ellmauer, C. (2023). A multi-agent system for ISR asset planning. In Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, & Applied Computing (CSCE) (pp. 136–144). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCE60160.2023.00027
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2023a). NATO Allies and Sweden strengthen intelligence cooperation during Unified Vision 2023. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_216223.htm
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2023b). Electromagnetic warfare. https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/electromagnetic-warfare
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2026a). NATO’s role in capability development. https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/natos-role-in-capability-development
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2026b). AWACS: NATO’s “eyes in the sky”. https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/awacs-natos-eyes-in-the-sky
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2026c). Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_111830.htm
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2026d). NATO’s approach to space. https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/natos-approach-to-space
Radovanovic, M., Zivkovic, M., & Crnogorac, M. (2025). Application of decision-making support model in the operations planning process at the tactical level. Vojenské Rozhledy: Czech Military Review, 34(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.3849/2336-2995.34.2025.01.085-103
Šenk, M., & Hynek, N. (2026). NATO/EU synergies against information warfare: A “circulatory institutionalist” model of expert voluntarism. European Security, 35(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2025.2566519
Toth, A. (2025). Enhancing situational awareness and decision-making. Hadmernok, 20(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.32567/hm.2025.2.9
Usov, D. (2024). Analysis of national security threats by NATO intelligence agencies: Trends and experience. Political Science and Security Studies Journal, 5(4), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.33445/psssj.2024.5.4.8
Vold, K. (2024). Human-AI cognitive teaming: Using AI to support state-level decision making on the resort to force. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2327383
Weaver, J. M. (2021). Allied Command Operations/Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (ACO/SHAPE). In NATO in contemporary times. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68731-1_3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vasyl Shkoliarenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
